14th Street NW Corridor Gets Another Look

Typical 14th activity
Image: Google

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) will hold a meeting to discuss how to make “lower, middle 14th Street NW” more attractive and accommodating to all users.

The meeting will be held Thursday, February 22, 2018 between 6:30pm to 8:30pm in the  Community Room of the National City Christian Church, 5 Thomas Circle NW.

According to DDOT, the project supports moveDC plan and the Mayor’s Vision Zero Initiative to help create a safer, more livable, sustainable and attractive corridor. The objective of the project is to increase multimodal safety and accessibility, improve mobility and pedestrian safety with ADA compliance, and improve the corridor with the new streetscape. 

As 14th Street is a major travel corridor, the mile long 14th Street NW Streetscape Project hopefully addresses concerns that bicyclists have noted for years. On social media, bicyclists complain that they are at risk as vehicles force them from the bike lane to the roadway or they are doored by unsuspecting vehicle occupants. Vehicles routinely double park in the roadway or bike lane and use the bike lane as a location to discharge passengers. There are also conflict with buses as they transition from the roadway to bus stops, making moving past them on bikes risky. 

Typical improvements in the 2010 version of 14th Street project
Image: DDOT

The current iteration of this project was listed in the draft D.C. Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in 2015 but a plan for this area was underway by DDOT as early as 2007. The 2010 14th Street Transportation and Streetscape Improvements plan, created before Vision Zero and other planning initiatives, focused on adding multimodal features to the corridor to include street resurfacing, bulb outs to add sidewalk space, additional bike parking at transit stops, decorative pavement, and other amenities to help improve pedestrian safety.

Since then, DDOT implemented certain elements of that project at key intersections and presumably, the current project will reexamine certain traffic elements, including making improvements to the bicycle infrastructure. As of the 2015 STIP, the total amount obligated to this project totals $10.6 million.

Specifically, the project scope of work will include, but will not be limited to the following:

  • Preparation of plans, estimates, and specifications for roadway resurfacing; 
  • Resetting or reconstructing curbs; 
  • Reconstructing wheelchair ramps and sidewalks; 
  • Upgrading streetlights; traffic signal and drainage system; 
  • Removal of dead trees and planting of new trees; 
  • Improving pavement marking and signage; 
  • and other work deemed appropriate. 

This section of 14th Street also contains one of the District’s high crash intersections at 14th and U Street NW. DDOT issued a report in 2017 that suggested providing additional enforcement to reduce double parking, green paint through the intersection, and a redesign of the bus bulbouts as they create bus/bike conflicts – all of which may be included in this project.

 

DDOT Construction Update – January 8 – January 21

Image: Author

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) produces a list of alley, sidewalk and road paving projects it hopes to complete within the next two weeks, weather permitting. As roads are a tool used by bicyclists, the following are projects that may affect your bike commute.

Road Paving Projects 

18th Street NW and 19th Street NW Pavement Restoration Project 
Monday, January 8, through Friday, January 12

DDOT will conduct brick sidewalk repair on 19th Street NW between L Street NW and M Street NW from Monday, January 8, through Friday, January 12. DDOT will also restore sidewalks, driveways, curbs, gutters and Americans with Disabilities Act ramps on 18th Street NW between Pennsylvania Avenue NW and L Street NW.

Citywide Pavement Restoration Projects

As part of DDOT’s commitment to improve and restore local roadways, work will be conducted at the following locations throughout the following two weeks, weather permitting:

Palisade Lane NW, between Loughboro Road NW and Dead End;
45th Street NW, between Warren Street NW and Van Ness Street NW;
45th Street NW, between Van Ness Street NW and Massachusetts Avenue NW;
Cathedral Avenue NW between 29th Street NW and Woodley Road NW.

Citywide Sidewalk Restoration Projects

As part of DDOT’s commitment to improve and restore local sidewalks, work will be conducted at the following locations throughout the following two weeks, weather permitting:

6th Street SE, between Brandywine Street SE and Chesapeake Street SE;
6th Street SE, between Mississippi Avenue SE and Savannah Street SE;
Suitland Road SE, between Alabama Avenue SE and Southern Avenue SE;
19th Street NE, between L Street NE and M Street NE;
Brandywine Street NW, between 36th Street NW and Reno Road NW;
Holbrook Street NW, between Neal Street NW and Florida Avenue NW;
Rodman Street NW, between Reno Road NW and Idaho Avenue NW.

DDOT Construction Update Monday, December 4 – Sunday, December 17

Image: Author

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) produces a list of alley, sidewalk and road paving projects it hopes to complete within the next two weeks, weather permitting. As roads are a tool used by bicyclists, the following are projects that may affect your bike commute.

Road Paving Projects 

Blair Road NW Pavement Restoration Project
Monday, December 4, through Friday, December 8 
Paving and restoration will occur on Blair Road NW from Monday, December 4, to Friday, December 8. DDOT will be saw-cutting and sheet patching at the intersection of Blair Road NW and Kansas Avenue NW from Tuesday, December 5, to Friday, December 8. DDOT will mill and pave between Butternut Street NW and Eastern Avenue NW, and conduct line striping between Kansas Avenue NW and Butternut Street NW from Monday, December 4, to Friday, December 8.

19th Street NW Pavement Restoration Project
Monday, December 4, through Friday, December 8

DDOT will restore sidewalks, driveways, curbs, gutters and ADA ramps on 19th Street NW between L Street NW and M Street NW, F Street NW and G Street NW and Pennsylvania Avenue NW and G Street NW from Monday, December 4, to Friday, December 8. In addition, installation of a catch basin will occur at the intersection of 19th Street NW and K Street NW from Tuesday, December 5, through Wednesday, December 6.

M Street NW Pavement Restoration Project
Monday, December 4, through Friday, December 8

DDOT will restore sidewalks, driveways, curbs, gutters and ADA ramps on M Street NW between 22nd Street NW and New Hampshire Avenue NW from Monday, December 4, to Friday, December 8.

Citywide Pavement Restoration Projects

As part of DDOT’s commitment to improve and restore local roadways, work will be conducted at the following locations throughout the following two weeks, weather permitting:

Connecticut Avenue NW, between Macomb Street NW and Calvert Street NW;
North Capitol Street NW, between Florida Avenue NW and New York Avenue NW;
12th Street SW, between Independence Avenue SW and C Street SW;
12th Street SW, between Maryland Avenue SW and Maine Street SW; and
Van Buren Street NW, between 8th Street NW and Piney Branch Road NW.

A Closer Look into the ACS Mode Share Data for the District

DSC_0491
Image: Author

Bike mode share continues to increase in the District, even as other cities seen slower growth or a  reduction bike use. With over 16,000 commuter bicyclists, the District is a national leader in bike mode share. While there are a number of factors that contribute to the District’s status, it appears that  women bicyclists – among other groups – are helping drive the city’s success, according to data from the Census.

As reported by Streetsblog and the D.C. Bicycle Advisory Council, the League of American Bicyclists looked at 2016 Census Bureau data on how Americans commute, specifically how they commute by bike. Called the American Community Survey (ACS), it is a nationwide survey designed to show communities how they are changing over time. The ACS collects information on age, race, income, home value, veteran status, and other important data.

The League complied this data and produced a comprehensive report called Where We Ride: An Analysis of Bicycling in American Cities. The yearly report measures the growth or decline of bicycling in across the 70 largest U.S. cities; the cities with the most commutes by bike; and ranks bike usages in each state, the District, and Puerto Rico. While the League focuses on national statistics, Bike Specific will show some of the District’s statistics from the League report, the ACS, and other sources.

The Data

The ACS examines data as reported by survey participants, so naturally it excludes those who simply were not contacted or who failed to complete the survey. Also, the survey source specifically collects information on work trips, not recreational or other bike usage. Lastly, the ACS states statistical margins of error up to +/- 2.5 percent, depending on the specific question.

The figures below are derived from ACS and League data. According to the League, there are two limitations to the data. The survey only measures those who “usually” get to work in the “last week” before the question was asked, and it only captures the mode used for the most distance. These limitations mean that occasional bike commuters and multi-modal commuters who use bikes are unlikely to be captured.

A subset of the ACS, the Commuting Characteristics By Sex data set is the source of most mode share information and identifies changes in how people get to and from work by their most common transportation modes. The mode shares identified are personal motorized vehicles (cars, trucks, vans), public transportation, walking, bicycling, car sharing or other means (taxicab, motorcycle, etc.), or working at home. Also, the ACS data aggregates data nationally, at the state, county, and city levels. Information can also be sorted at the zip code level, which could be useful at a later point.

Unfortunately, the Commuting Characteristics by Sex data set doesn’t correlate income, race, or other factors captured in other data sets, which would be help given the District’s diversity. For this post, let’s focus only on the Commuting Characteristics by Sex data and information collected by the league.

National Trends

Since 1990, bicycle commuting has seen steady growth; however, that growth has slowed or retreated. The total number of U.S. bike commuters fell slightly in 2016, for the second year in a row, to 863,979. While the overall number seems impressive, that translates into a national commuting mode share of only 0.57 percent. Streetsblog suggests that the gas price spike between 2008-2014 helped fuel the some of the mode shift to bicycling and as those prices have leveled off, some recent converts have shifted back to cars or some other commuting mode.


The figure above, which is complied from the League’s analysis, shows the bicycling commuter mode share nationally and for the 70 largest cities from 1990 through 2016. From 1990 to 2000, bike commuting saw stagnent growth. Since 2000, and with a few exceptions, overall bike use grew annually until 2014 for states and cities. From the height of the automotive fuel costs in 2014 until 2016; however, bike commuter mode share has decreases approximately 8.1 percent at the state level and 12.2 percent in the 70 largest cities where it plateaued in 2013 and has fallen each year since.

Share of Bike Commuters

Unlike many cities, the District has seen continued growth in commutes by bike, making it one of the top U.S. cities. Several factors contribute to this including that three out of four District residents work in the District, according to the survey. If you compared the District as a state, it would by far have the highest bicycle mode share in the nation. Since 1990, bike use has increased approximately 506 percent and in 2000, only about 3,000 respondents stated that they commuted by bike.

The figure above shows the top 10 largest cities with the highest bike mode share for 2016. The data shows that the District ranks second only to Portland, Oregon with the highest share of bicycle commuters at 4.6 percent. Portland may take the top spot with an impressive 6.3 percent bike commuter mode share, but its recent growth is anemic. From 2011 to 2016, Portland’s bike mode share grew only 1.0 percent, while the District grew at 46.0 percent. From 2015 to 2016, Portland experienced a 9.6 percent drop in bike commuting. Conversely, the District experienced a bike mode share increase of 12.1 percent during the same period.

Women and Bicycling

While there are many factors that contribute to the District’s bicycling status including topography, income, and bike infrastructure improvements, new women bicyclists may be the prime contributor to the growth of bicycling in the District according to the ACS.

Recently created organizations like Black Women Bike DC and the Washington Area Bicyclists Association’s Women & Bicycles program have provided a forum for women to talk about bicycling and help them develop the confidence to do so safely. Before that in 1999, cycling groups like Artemis Racing were helping women reach their bicycling goals. There no coincidence that their work has contributed to the growth of women bicyclists as well as the overall growth of bicycling in the District.

The ACS Commuting Characteristics by Sex data set reveals that 3.8 percent of women report that they commuted to work by bike in 2016. To put this increase in perspective, in 2006 total bike commuter mode share was at 2.0 percent; with only 1.1 percent of women reporting that they commute by bike. Both men and women have seen an increase in mode share since. Between 2006 to 2016, bike commuting saw a 86.2 percent increase among men. However during the same period, the District saw dramatic growth in women commuting by bike, a 245.5 percent increase.

The survey sugguests that women are moving away from cars and transit and considering bikes or other transportation modes for their commutes. The figure above shows the change in commuting mode share for women in the District, comparing the change from 2015 to 2016 (blue) and from 2010 to 2016 (red). Women who commuted by bicycle increased 21.1 percent between 2015 ad 2016. Since 2010, car use in the District has experienced a 7.0 percent commuter mode share decrease while transit has seen a decrease 8.4 percent. Since 2010, more women are using taxicabs, motorcycles or car share options like Lyft and Uber to commute to work, growing by 35.7 percent. The expansion of teleworking in the District allows more women to avoid on the roads commuting, as increasing by 23.7 percent over the last six years.

Changes in Other Commuting Modes

When comparing bike commuting with all other modes over the ten year period from 2006 to 2016, we see that the change is much more compelling.

The figure above shows the commuter mode share of all modes in the District where blue is 2006 and red is 2016. In 2006, 41.7 percent of all commutes were by car, but in 2016 that number dropped to 38.1 percent, a decrease of 8.6 percent. While 38.1 percent of trips is still a relatively high, it demonstrates that people are choosing to leave their cars at home or use some other mode to get to work. The loss of transit riders in the District appears real. Transit mode share in 2016 decreased to 36.0 percent of commuter trips, a decrease of 7.7 percent from 2006.

The figure above shows the overall change in mode share, comparing 2006 with 2016. By far bicycle commuting has seen the largest increase, growing by 130.0 percent during that time. The walking commuter and those who used car share or motorcycles to get to work saw increases of 16.1 and 14.3 percent, respectively. Those deciding to work from home saw a 50.0 percent mode share increase from 4.0 to 6.0 percent. As the Coalition on Smarter Growth noted, the District has the highest share of commuters who both bike and walk, a combined total of 18.3 percent.

Other Bike Commuting Statistics

The League report also notes which U.S. cities have the largest number of bicyclists. Among the nation’s largest cities, New York and Chicago top the list with an estimated 48,601 and 22,449, respectively. The District ranks 6th in the nation with 16,647 bicyclists commuters. Streetsblog notes that Davis, California, one of the country’s longtime leaders in bicycle mode share, saw its third straight year of falling estimates in the ACS. An estimated 17.0 percent of trips were made by bike, down from 25.0 percent in 2013.

District Bike Commuter Mode Share has increased
506 percent since 1990. [ACS]

If there is one area where the District is lacking, it’s cities with the highest share of bicyclists. The District is tied 13 out of the top 20 cities of total trips made by bike. This figure ranks all cities with populations over 50,000.

Where Does the District Stand

For some, bicycling in the District may not be a year-round activity as it tends to have cold winters and hot, humid summers. Additionally, bicycling competes with at least a half-a-dozen other transportation modes including the much maligned but fairly effective WMATA, robust car-sharing, telecomuting  walking, and potentially gondolas. The terrain and natural or man-made impediments may also play a role in certain areas, especially in communities east of the Anacostia River. And to be honest, bicycling isn’t for everyone.

The District has seen a solid and promising increase in the number of women bicycle commuters but it could be higher. FiveThrityEight asked in 2014 “Why Women Don’t Cycle“? While they cite several reasons including legitimate issues like hygiene and what clothes to wear, safety was the biggest concern. The 2010 Women’s Cycling Survey found that over 73 percent of women were concerned about distracted driving. About 13 percent were concerned about sexual assault, harassment or sexism while biking, which the District discussed earlier this year. The same post cited survey results from the Bikes Belong Coalition, which found that ‘women were twice as likely as men to report an “inability to carry children or other passengers” as a factor that discouraged them from cycling’.

The District’s inclusion of people of color and lower income residents has been mixed. For years, these communities did not have access to affordable bikes or safe infrastructure that allowed them to safely access the city’s core or its jobs. While there are plans to reconstruct infrastructure to encourage bicycling, many of the these projects will take years to complete. Even then, the District government and the bike community must work with communities to address specific needs. For example, the average cost of car ownership could be as high as $11,000 per year. By contrast, bike ownership is relatively low at a less than $400 per year.

However, the initial investment of a bike purchase could be high and bicycle maintenance is a potential deterrent as some areas of the District have no local bike shops. The introduction of Capital BikeShare and dockless bike sharing in 2017 has the potential to lower that entry costs to a few dollars per use and also eliminates maintenance costs. Connecting dockless with lower income residents could lead to substantial growth in bike mode share for both recreation and commuting.

Getting women and children on bikes is important.
Image: Author

Since the District initiated MoveDC, its multi-modal long-range transportation plan, bicycle commuting has grown about 46 percent, which is likely not a coincidence. This suggests that if the city plans and builds bike infrastructure, people will use it – women, children, the poor, and the elderly can use it. Also, new infrastructure like the 15th Street protected bike lane, the Metropolitan Branch Trail, and and the L and M street protected lanes have likely helped ‘induce demand’.

As the data suggests however, the growth in bike commuting mode share could become stagnate or drop as it has in other cities. The District, its regional partners, and the bike community should continue to both improve and maintain the transportation network and reach out to communities and groups that were historically ignored. This means constructing safe bike parking, access to shower or changing facilities, and understanding how traditionally underserved groups see bicycling.

Working together, they can encourage the use of non-single occupancy motorized vehicles – removing cars from the road and potentially allowing more space for biking, walking, transit – and one day perhaps – gondolas and funiculars. This will potentially make bicycling safer for everyone, increasing the likelihood that more people will chose to bike to work. The ACS data seems to suggest that the key to the expansion of bicycling in the District – and nationally – is to continue to focus on women and those who haven’t experienced the the joy of the bike commute.

ANCs in Ward 6 Want to Make K Street NE Safer for Bicyclists and Pedestrians

K Street Makes Moves. Image: Author

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) discussed the K Street NE Traffic Study at the 6C Advisory Neighborhood Commission’s (ANC) September meeting. One alternative would add bicycle lanes along K Street NE, potentially creating what would be one of the few direct, crosstown bicycle routes in the city. As expected, there were concerns about the loss of vehicle parking for all 4 presented alternatives, however; DDOT will continue its study.

As reported by Elizabeth O’Gorek of the HillRag, Washcycle, and WABA,  ANC 6C contacted DDOT requesting that it initiate a study to determine how to create safer streets for pedestrians and bicyclists. The corridor, from approximately North Capitol Street to Florida Avenue NE, is prone to speeding and other forms of aggressive driving.

In May of this year, ANC 6C and 6A jointly requested that DDOT examine bicycling along K Street. DDOT presented preliminary findings in August as part of its K Street Corridor Safety Assessment to analyze safety concerns. The assessment included the evaluation of vehicular crash history and existing traffic operations along the corridor. The assessment also discussed the potential impact of the NoMa Bicycle Network study currently underway. That study will review existing transportation plans to determine how they relate to the current and planned bicycle network, overall travel demand, and safety road user safety.

Community Response

According to HillRag, the committee noted it had received considerable feedback, particularly from residents of K Street and especially regarding to the parking aspects of proposals. The committee’s representative said they were sensitive to parking concerns but, as the overall purpose of the study was to enhance safety, felt bike lanes were the most important addition to K Street, the only corridor proceeding both east and west for that distance.

The committee chair noted that cyclists will continue to use K Street regardless or what actions are eventually taken, it was thought. The representative emphasized that this was only a preliminary study and would also affect ANC 6A.Community members voiced opposition to the four proposed plans, especially option four. Concerns about the elimination of parking safety and the necessity for bike lanes were expressed, especially by residents of the 600 block of K Street NE.

Presented Alternatives

The HillRag states that while the study is ongoing, DDOT presented four traffic-calming measures, each instituting a road diet: removing rush-hour no parking restrictions and making parking full-time for residents, among other actions.

Study Corridor. Image: DDOT

Alternatives 1 through 3 are generally car-specific options that provide increasingly longer  vehicle turning queues. They include a reduction in the total number of travel lanes from 2 peak lanes in each direction to one in each direction at all times, adding left-turn lanes along the corridor. These alternative reduce current off-peak parking from a total of 216 to 171 full‐time on‐street parking spaces in alternative 1, a total of 155 full-time spaces in alternative 2, and 144 full time spaces in alternative 3. The alternatives also adds protective bulb outs also called curb extensions to reduce the crossing distances for pedestrians and an school drop‐off zone at the 600 block of K Street.

Road Diet Alternative #4 – Bike Lanes. Image: DDOT

Alternative 4, recommended by the study and moveDC, adds east and west bicycle lanes along the corridor. This option eliminates on‐street parking on south side of street and retains the fewest number of parking, 110 full-time spaces. This option maintains school parking and a drop‐off zone on north side of the street, curb extensions or on north side of roadway as seen in the other alternatives, but appears to eliminate turning queues that appear in alternatives 1 through 3.

Typical cross section of K Street NE. Image: DDOT

Other Alternatives

NoMa Bike Study looks at the feasibility of bike route through the area. Image: DDOT

While the K Street option is attractive, other bike-related studies being evaluated. Related to the K Street safety review, the NoMa Bicycle Network Study currently underway is examining existing and planned bike facilities through and to this area. The study is also examining the feasibility of creating new or extending current bike routes from east-to-west along M, N, L, and K Streets. Just as K Street is in the MoveDC plan with bike lanes, the plan also anticipates the extension of the L Street protected bike lanes from their current terminus at Massachusetts Avenue NW to 1st Street NE. While currently not a fully-realized bike route under consideration, L Street NE is used by bicyclists as an alternative to K Street as it generally sees fewer cars moving at high speeds.

In the East West Corridor Feasibility and Barriers to Cycling image above, DDOT identifies impediments to connecting NoMa to its eastern neighbors. DDOT seems to suggest that an L street bike lane from east to west might be marginally more feasible. South of K Street, I (eye) street has shared lanes or contraflow bike lanes. Containing less vehicle traffic and fewer stop lights it provides an alternative to the busier K Street but ends at 2nd Street NE.