A Closer Look into the ACS Mode Share Data for the District

DSC_0491
Image: Author

Bike mode share continues to increase in the District, even as other cities seen slower growth or a  reduction bike use. With over 16,000 commuter bicyclists, the District is a national leader in bike mode share. While there are a number of factors that contribute to the District’s status, it appears that  women bicyclists – among other groups – are helping drive the city’s success, according to data from the Census.

As reported by Streetsblog and the D.C. Bicycle Advisory Council, the League of American Bicyclists looked at 2016 Census Bureau data on how Americans commute, specifically how they commute by bike. Called the American Community Survey (ACS), it is a nationwide survey designed to show communities how they are changing over time. The ACS collects information on age, race, income, home value, veteran status, and other important data.

The League complied this data and produced a comprehensive report called Where We Ride: An Analysis of Bicycling in American Cities. The yearly report measures the growth or decline of bicycling in across the 70 largest U.S. cities; the cities with the most commutes by bike; and ranks bike usages in each state, the District, and Puerto Rico. While the League focuses on national statistics, Bike Specific will show some of the District’s statistics from the League report, the ACS, and other sources.

The Data

The ACS examines data as reported by survey participants, so naturally it excludes those who simply were not contacted or who failed to complete the survey. Also, the survey source specifically collects information on work trips, not recreational or other bike usage. Lastly, the ACS states statistical margins of error up to +/- 2.5 percent, depending on the specific question.

The figures below are derived from ACS and League data. According to the League, there are two limitations to the data. The survey only measures those who “usually” get to work in the “last week” before the question was asked, and it only captures the mode used for the most distance. These limitations mean that occasional bike commuters and multi-modal commuters who use bikes are unlikely to be captured.

A subset of the ACS, the Commuting Characteristics By Sex data set is the source of most mode share information and identifies changes in how people get to and from work by their most common transportation modes. The mode shares identified are personal motorized vehicles (cars, trucks, vans), public transportation, walking, bicycling, car sharing or other means (taxicab, motorcycle, etc.), or working at home. Also, the ACS data aggregates data nationally, at the state, county, and city levels. Information can also be sorted at the zip code level, which could be useful at a later point.

Unfortunately, the Commuting Characteristics by Sex data set doesn’t correlate income, race, or other factors captured in other data sets, which would be help given the District’s diversity. For this post, let’s focus only on the Commuting Characteristics by Sex data and information collected by the league.

National Trends

Since 1990, bicycle commuting has seen steady growth; however, that growth has slowed or retreated. The total number of U.S. bike commuters fell slightly in 2016, for the second year in a row, to 863,979. While the overall number seems impressive, that translates into a national commuting mode share of only 0.57 percent. Streetsblog suggests that the gas price spike between 2008-2014 helped fuel the some of the mode shift to bicycling and as those prices have leveled off, some recent converts have shifted back to cars or some other commuting mode.


The figure above, which is complied from the League’s analysis, shows the bicycling commuter mode share nationally and for the 70 largest cities from 1990 through 2016. From 1990 to 2000, bike commuting saw stagnent growth. Since 2000, and with a few exceptions, overall bike use grew annually until 2014 for states and cities. From the height of the automotive fuel costs in 2014 until 2016; however, bike commuter mode share has decreases approximately 8.1 percent at the state level and 12.2 percent in the 70 largest cities where it plateaued in 2013 and has fallen each year since.

Share of Bike Commuters

Unlike many cities, the District has seen continued growth in commutes by bike, making it one of the top U.S. cities. Several factors contribute to this including that three out of four District residents work in the District, according to the survey. If you compared the District as a state, it would by far have the highest bicycle mode share in the nation. Since 1990, bike use has increased approximately 506 percent and in 2000, only about 3,000 respondents stated that they commuted by bike.

The figure above shows the top 10 largest cities with the highest bike mode share for 2016. The data shows that the District ranks second only to Portland, Oregon with the highest share of bicycle commuters at 4.6 percent. Portland may take the top spot with an impressive 6.3 percent bike commuter mode share, but its recent growth is anemic. From 2011 to 2016, Portland’s bike mode share grew only 1.0 percent, while the District grew at 46.0 percent. From 2015 to 2016, Portland experienced a 9.6 percent drop in bike commuting. Conversely, the District experienced a bike mode share increase of 12.1 percent during the same period.

Women and Bicycling

While there are many factors that contribute to the District’s bicycling status including topography, income, and bike infrastructure improvements, new women bicyclists may be the prime contributor to the growth of bicycling in the District according to the ACS.

Recently created organizations like Black Women Bike DC and the Washington Area Bicyclists Association’s Women & Bicycles program have provided a forum for women to talk about bicycling and help them develop the confidence to do so safely. Before that in 1999, cycling groups like Artemis Racing were helping women reach their bicycling goals. There no coincidence that their work has contributed to the growth of women bicyclists as well as the overall growth of bicycling in the District.

The ACS Commuting Characteristics by Sex data set reveals that 3.8 percent of women report that they commuted to work by bike in 2016. To put this increase in perspective, in 2006 total bike commuter mode share was at 2.0 percent; with only 1.1 percent of women reporting that they commute by bike. Both men and women have seen an increase in mode share since. Between 2006 to 2016, bike commuting saw a 86.2 percent increase among men. However during the same period, the District saw dramatic growth in women commuting by bike, a 245.5 percent increase.

The survey sugguests that women are moving away from cars and transit and considering bikes or other transportation modes for their commutes. The figure above shows the change in commuting mode share for women in the District, comparing the change from 2015 to 2016 (blue) and from 2010 to 2016 (red). Women who commuted by bicycle increased 21.1 percent between 2015 ad 2016. Since 2010, car use in the District has experienced a 7.0 percent commuter mode share decrease while transit has seen a decrease 8.4 percent. Since 2010, more women are using taxicabs, motorcycles or car share options like Lyft and Uber to commute to work, growing by 35.7 percent. The expansion of teleworking in the District allows more women to avoid on the roads commuting, as increasing by 23.7 percent over the last six years.

Changes in Other Commuting Modes

When comparing bike commuting with all other modes over the ten year period from 2006 to 2016, we see that the change is much more compelling.

The figure above shows the commuter mode share of all modes in the District where blue is 2006 and red is 2016. In 2006, 41.7 percent of all commutes were by car, but in 2016 that number dropped to 38.1 percent, a decrease of 8.6 percent. While 38.1 percent of trips is still a relatively high, it demonstrates that people are choosing to leave their cars at home or use some other mode to get to work. The loss of transit riders in the District appears real. Transit mode share in 2016 decreased to 36.0 percent of commuter trips, a decrease of 7.7 percent from 2006.

The figure above shows the overall change in mode share, comparing 2006 with 2016. By far bicycle commuting has seen the largest increase, growing by 130.0 percent during that time. The walking commuter and those who used car share or motorcycles to get to work saw increases of 16.1 and 14.3 percent, respectively. Those deciding to work from home saw a 50.0 percent mode share increase from 4.0 to 6.0 percent. As the Coalition on Smarter Growth noted, the District has the highest share of commuters who both bike and walk, a combined total of 18.3 percent.

Other Bike Commuting Statistics

The League report also notes which U.S. cities have the largest number of bicyclists. Among the nation’s largest cities, New York and Chicago top the list with an estimated 48,601 and 22,449, respectively. The District ranks 6th in the nation with 16,647 bicyclists commuters. Streetsblog notes that Davis, California, one of the country’s longtime leaders in bicycle mode share, saw its third straight year of falling estimates in the ACS. An estimated 17.0 percent of trips were made by bike, down from 25.0 percent in 2013.

District Bike Commuter Mode Share has increased
506 percent since 1990. [ACS]

If there is one area where the District is lacking, it’s cities with the highest share of bicyclists. The District is tied 13 out of the top 20 cities of total trips made by bike. This figure ranks all cities with populations over 50,000.

Where Does the District Stand

For some, bicycling in the District may not be a year-round activity as it tends to have cold winters and hot, humid summers. Additionally, bicycling competes with at least a half-a-dozen other transportation modes including the much maligned but fairly effective WMATA, robust car-sharing, telecomuting  walking, and potentially gondolas. The terrain and natural or man-made impediments may also play a role in certain areas, especially in communities east of the Anacostia River. And to be honest, bicycling isn’t for everyone.

The District has seen a solid and promising increase in the number of women bicycle commuters but it could be higher. FiveThrityEight asked in 2014 “Why Women Don’t Cycle“? While they cite several reasons including legitimate issues like hygiene and what clothes to wear, safety was the biggest concern. The 2010 Women’s Cycling Survey found that over 73 percent of women were concerned about distracted driving. About 13 percent were concerned about sexual assault, harassment or sexism while biking, which the District discussed earlier this year. The same post cited survey results from the Bikes Belong Coalition, which found that ‘women were twice as likely as men to report an “inability to carry children or other passengers” as a factor that discouraged them from cycling’.

The District’s inclusion of people of color and lower income residents has been mixed. For years, these communities did not have access to affordable bikes or safe infrastructure that allowed them to safely access the city’s core or its jobs. While there are plans to reconstruct infrastructure to encourage bicycling, many of the these projects will take years to complete. Even then, the District government and the bike community must work with communities to address specific needs. For example, the average cost of car ownership could be as high as $11,000 per year. By contrast, bike ownership is relatively low at a less than $400 per year.

However, the initial investment of a bike purchase could be high and bicycle maintenance is a potential deterrent as some areas of the District have no local bike shops. The introduction of Capital BikeShare and dockless bike sharing in 2017 has the potential to lower that entry costs to a few dollars per use and also eliminates maintenance costs. Connecting dockless with lower income residents could lead to substantial growth in bike mode share for both recreation and commuting.

Getting women and children on bikes is important.
Image: Author

Since the District initiated MoveDC, its multi-modal long-range transportation plan, bicycle commuting has grown about 46 percent, which is likely not a coincidence. This suggests that if the city plans and builds bike infrastructure, people will use it – women, children, the poor, and the elderly can use it. Also, new infrastructure like the 15th Street protected bike lane, the Metropolitan Branch Trail, and and the L and M street protected lanes have likely helped ‘induce demand’.

As the data suggests however, the growth in bike commuting mode share could become stagnate or drop as it has in other cities. The District, its regional partners, and the bike community should continue to both improve and maintain the transportation network and reach out to communities and groups that were historically ignored. This means constructing safe bike parking, access to shower or changing facilities, and understanding how traditionally underserved groups see bicycling.

Working together, they can encourage the use of non-single occupancy motorized vehicles – removing cars from the road and potentially allowing more space for biking, walking, transit – and one day perhaps – gondolas and funiculars. This will potentially make bicycling safer for everyone, increasing the likelihood that more people will chose to bike to work. The ACS data seems to suggest that the key to the expansion of bicycling in the District – and nationally – is to continue to focus on women and those who haven’t experienced the the joy of the bike commute.

Travel Website Reward Expert Lists its Top 10 US Cities to Explore by Bike

Popsicles (91 of 108)
The District ranks 5th among the 2017’s Best
Destinations to Explore by Bike
Image: Author

The District is considered one of the best places for tourists and other explorers to bike ride, according to a report by the travel site Reward Expert.

While most studies like this are more or less based on the feelings of the author, this one uses good a methodology that the District could use to evaluate its progress at the ward or community level.

The District’s Rank
The site compared 53 of the largest cities in the country and using 13 metrics across four categories to determine a full ranking of the most bike-friendly cities.

The District was ranked 5th with a score of 91.8, just edging out the former bicycling infrastructure leader, Portland which had a score of 90.6, and miles behind 4th place New York and Chicago, tied with a score of 93.3. The site notes that one of the main reasons for the District high rank is its Capital BikeShare program, one of the nation’s largest. The District also tied for first when it comes to safety as it averages 1.6 fatalities per 10,000 bike commuters annually.

Where the District struggles is with its bike infrastructure, where it is ranked 28 out of 53 other cities. This suggests that the year-over-year additions to bike facilies as well as the number of bike lanes is lower than the top 4 cities. Also, although BikeShare is expanding rapidly across the District with 463 bikes per 10,000 commuters in its fleet, the methodology dings us as it compares the number of actual bikes and the number of stations per capita equally.

A Thorough Methodology
Reward Expert used a fairly comprehensive methodology to create its ranking score using U.S. cities with more than 300,000 residents. As mentioned, the site grouped ‘Bikeability’ using four overall metrics or dimensions:

1) City Profile
2) Bike Safety
3) Biking Infrastructure
4) Bike-Share Programs

They identified 13 metrics or indicators in respective dimensions, weighting them accordingly. Each metric was given a value between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the most favorable conditions for travel and zero the least. Finally, they calculated the overall score for each city using the weighted average across all metrics and ranked the cities accordingly. The metrics are as follows:

City Profile – 20 Points

  • Bikeability: Full Weight (5.0%) 
  • Number of Pleasant Days Per Year: Half Weight (2.5%) 
  • Percent of Commuters who Bike: Half Weight (2.5%) 
  • Annualized Change of Commuters Who Bike To Work: Double Weight (10.0%)

Biking Infrastructure – 40 Points

  • Miles of Protected Bike Lanes: Weight 10.0% 
  • Miles of Unprotected Bike Lanes: Weight 5.0% 
  • Miles of Paved Biking Paths: Full Weight 3.0% 
  • Miles of Bike Lanes per Square Mile: Weight 2.0% 
  • Annualized Change of Bike Lanes per Square Mile: Weight 20.0%


Biking Share Index – 25 Points

  • Number of Bikes in Program Fleet per capita: Full Weight (12.5%) 
  • Number of Bike Stations per capita: Full Weight (12.5%)

Biking Safety – 15 Points

  • Pedestrian/Biker fatalities per 10,000 commuters: Weight 5.0% 
  • Annualized Change of pedestrian/Biker Fatalities per 10,000 commuters: Weight 10.0%

How DDOT Could Use a Ranking System
One of the shortcomings of the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) with regard to the installation of bicycling facilities is that they do not appear to use – or at least share with the public – a methodology to determine an area’s needs. While they do occasionally share study information, those studies tends to focus on overall road throughput or safety instead of the strengths or weaknesses of a community’s bike facilities.

Another problem is that DDOT has added bike infrastructure where they could do so easily, not necessarily because it was needed. While there are advantages to this approach, the lack of any quantitative ranking mechanism makes it easier for some to reject projects that could be highly beneficial or providing more bike facilities to communities that are already great for bicycling.

By measuring District Wards or communities using score or a methodology similar to the Reward Expert study, DDOT could rank areas and bike needs so that all road users could understand how their areas stack up. Also, it would provide residents some idea of the bike inventory and why they should or should not receive additional bicycle facilities. Funds could then be redirected toward outreach and other resources of traditionally undeserved communities.

 The entire list of the top 53 cities, as well as the article, can be found here.

Carsharing Program Zipcar Celebrates Bike Month

The car sharing program Zipcar sent an email to its subscribers in support of Bike Month.

To transport you bike over the hills and dales to the mountains or the beaches, Zipcar provides roof-mounted bike racks on selected cars. Actually, it appears to be one car in the District, a good reason why you haven’t heard of this program if you are a member.

The email also from the car-sharing program also worked with Green Line Velo (Boston’s official cycling team) to make two 1980s era a three-minute videos called “Biking in an urban environment” and “Finding the right bike for you“.

Last, Zipcar has a contest allowing it’s users to win a PUBLIC V7 Bike. All member have to do is,

 “share your #bikestories with @Zipcar on Twitter, and you could win one of these sweet V7 bikes from PUBLIC! Tell us why you bike in the city, share some riding tips, or post some pics of your ride.”

Below are some #BikeStories tweets that I’m certain can be out done by #BikeDC…Not that it’s a contest describing your journey to becoming a bicyclists…well, it is.

#bikestories Tweets

The Morning Commute – January 27, 2017

The Morning Commute is an occasional look at meetings or other #BikeSpecific discussions happening in the District.

It also looks at interesting bike ideas or concepts from other places across the globe that could possibly work around here.

Maybe.

  • The Rhode Island Avenue NE Streetscape gets another look
  • Tactical Urbanism comes to North Capitol Street and Lincoln Road
  • A discussion regarding ideas to get the most out of commuter benefits so that employers can get the most of of employees

Rhode Island Avenue NE Streetscape
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 from 5:00pm-8:00pm, the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) will hold a public meeting regarding streetscape plans for the Rhode Island Avenue corridor. The meeting will be held at the Woodridge Neighborhood Library, 1801 Hamlin St NE, Washington, DC 20018.

According to the Rhode Island Avenue NE Streetscape Master Plan, the project area includes 28 blocks of Rhode Island Avenue, NE, from 4th Street, NE to Eastern Avenue, NE. DDOT envisions an outcome that is pedestrian friendly and includes amenities like distinctive sidewalks, useful street furniture, lighting improvements, employs low-impact development strategies, street trees and other green spaces.

Generally, the project hopes to recreate the this section of the avenue from a commuter freeway to a cohesive neighborhood street. The project also hopes to spur nascent commercial development This project was initially posed to begin construction in 2015 but was delayed.

This is not the first project aimed at reshaping Rhode Island Avenue. In 2008 and 2011, the Office of Planning completed its Great Streets Initiative and Small Area Plans. The plans took a more commercial focus, suggested thinking of the corridor as a “diamond–a largely un-mined yet valuable investment opportunity“. This corridor was also a potential route for the much maligned DC Streetcar. The most recent DDOT Streetscape Master Plan for the areas was completed in 2014 and has few suggestions to improve bicycling in the area, other than additional bike parking.

Since then, plans for the corridor continue to expand. They include  the planned development of the massive MRP Realty Rhode Island Center, redevelopment of the Rhode Island Shopping Center; and the controversal redevelopment of the Brookland Manor apartments.

This meeting provides an opportunity for bicyclists to request additional amenities. Amenities could include the expansion of the three Capital BikeShare stations on or close to the project corridor. Other improvements could include way finding signage or (GASP!) a road diet for Rhode Island Avenue to include the introduction of protected bike lanes (Pearls!) or a shared trail (OMG!).
(Rhode Island Streetscape Project)

Tactical Urbanism at North Capitol Street and Lincoln Road
No, this isn’t the militarization of the street but an attempt to add pedestrian safety components at the intersection of North Capitol and Lincoln Road, NE.

DDOT will hold a public meeting Monday, February 13, 2017, 6:30 – 8:00pm at the NoMa BID Lobby, 1200 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002 to discuss how to make immediate and temporary improvements to this intersection.

Citylab states that Tactical Urbanism is quick, often temporary, and cheap projects that hope to make a small part of a city more lively or enjoyable.These projects include the closing of streets to vehicular traffic or other temporary changes, like the District’s annual Park(ing) day, that allows people to enjoy public space.

This tactical meeting will help DDOT gather information about ongoing or new concerns at the intersection as well as collect data to aid in a future, larger intersection reconstruction project that aims to add permanent structures. DDOT will present a draft design concept and gather comments from the community at this public meeting.

According to DDOT, the initial improvement are based on recommendation from the Mid-City East Livability Study, completed August 2004. Initial plans include closing  a portion of Lincoln Road where vehicles merge on to North Capitol Street. Eventually, the plan hopes to expand to incorporate more of the Mid-City East recommendations.

Funding for these improvements are supported in part through a grant from the Knight Foundation, obtained from the Office of Planning. Using the grant funding, DDOT will use data gathered from this initial project to help inform the larger scale design project. (DDOT)

Changing the Commuter Equation
Just when you thought that you were done with math, Thursday, February 9 from 6:30 to 8:30pm, the Coalition for Smarter Growth will discuss ‘how we can use flexible commuter benefits to create less traffic and pollution and happier workers’. The discussion will occur at ZGF Architects, 1800 K Street, NW, Suite 200.

The discussion hopes to marshal efforts in cities, towns, and other jurisdictions to encourage the use of commuter benefits for more than just cars.  A panel of experts will discuss what it would look like if employers in the District offered a more flexible commuter benefit that converts an employer-subsidized parking space into commuter cash, perhaps encouraging the use of sustainable commuting choices like biking and walking.

Speakers include: Steven Higashide, Senior Program Analyst, Transit Center; Michael Grant, Vice President, ICF;  Marina Budimir, Transportation Planner-TDM, District Department of Transportation; and Cheryl Cort, Policy Director, Coalition for Smarter Growth. Registration requested. (Coalition For Smarter Growth)